Stats, undeniably tell the truth.
They sort of do more or less. The stats indicate that I haven't crashed since I started doing serious slow school riding practice on a regular basis to remain proficient therefore I'm safe. Right? Right? There are lots of variables and the intent of the data can be altered to prove points...
I assumed this was a no-no, but from NHTSA.gov, ride in the day time- ALWAYS with your brights on.
I use to do that because everyone I ran across kept saying to. Motorcycle+high beam+daytime=visible=safe. Then after near miss #431568461 I started thinking for myself and observing other motorcycles objectively from an anti collision/survival point of view. The plan was, and still is, to figure out what works and what doesn't based on real world environment observations. Bright lights do stand out most of the time. Beyond that though, the high beam is hiding essential information to oncoming drivers. It overpowers position and velocity information by being excessively obvious of it's presence. Determining it's velocity and position became more difficult. The closer the motorcycle gets, the more the blinding light overpowers useful information.
Is the hurt report and nthsa right? Or am I right? I don't have as many data points as they do however when I started running with low beams in the day, my specific datapoints indicate a considerably reduced number of safety buffer incursions by oncoming and crossing traffic.
Bright helmets are good right? Think further and about the environment it's in as well. Fire engine red is a bright color. It's also a heavily saturated color. The background of a typical street environment at eye level is heavily saturated with background shadows. To make the bright color stand out, there also needs to be high contrast, like yellow against black, not deep red against black. IOW, a red helmet is a dark color against a shaded background and doesn't stand out as well as other colors.
As the big long 15 foot long sign over my old philosophy/practical psychology instructor's office door said: Question Authority.
Take general rule information that has potential for variation in an extremely dynamic environment as a good start reference point then think objectively about the information beyond the sentence and about the other variables not listed in the specific set of criteria.
Just something to think about...